Monthly Archives: March 2003

Amici Curiae in USA vs. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.

By |2016-01-15T12:10:31-05:00March 5th, 2003|Updates|

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Appellants v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF SEXUALITY SCHOLARS, RESEARCHERS, EDUCATORS, AND THERAPISTS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEE   No. 98-1682 In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1998 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware Marjorie Heins Counsel of Record 170 West [...]

Views – The Silver Lining?

By |2019-03-07T23:17:05-05:00March 5th, 2003|Censorship News Articles|

  Issue 88, Winter 2002/2003 by Joan E. Bertin New Yorkers learned a lot about the First Amendment from former Mayor Giuliani. He was sued for infringing free speech more than any mayor in memory, and maybe in history. Ironically this became a living civics lesson. Even those who disagreed vehemently with the message supported the KKK's right to demonstrate peaceably [...]

Academic Freedom Bites the Dust

By |2019-03-12T17:41:51-04:00March 5th, 2003|Censorship News Articles|

NCAC Censorship News Issue #81:
by Marjorie Heins

In January, the Supreme Court declined to review a sweeping decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit that essentially denied state-employed professors any First Amendment right to academic freedom. The case of Urofsky v. Gilmore was a challenge to a Virginia law that barred state employees (with the exception of state police) from using state-owned or state-leased computers to access any "sexually explicit" Internet content without prior written approval from their "agency head."

Go to Top