
in support of free expression
The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design
free speech first amendment censorship
|
|
|
|
|
J.S.G.
Boggs, a visual and performance artist, created
artworks that were “images of money”.
Boggs would exchange his artwork for various goods
and services, always explaining to the merchants
that he is an artist and prompting them think
about the meaning and uses of art and money in
everyday life. There was no fraud involved. Over
many years, Boggs had "spent" thousands
of pictures of currency ("Boggs Bills")
around the world. In 1993, after federal officials
seized the bulk of the artist's life work and
informed him that he could be prosecuted for violation
of federal anti-counterfeiting law, Boggs challenged
the constitutionality of certain provisions of
the anti-counterfeiting statutes (18 U.S.C. §§
474 and 504). Boggs claimed that 18 U.S.C. §§
474 and 504 prohibit him from using illustrations
of United States currency as vehicles for the
expression of opinions and ideas in violation
of his First
Amendment rights.

The District Court held and the Court of Appeals
Affirmed:
| • |
The
counterfeiting provisions were constitutional
because they only placed reasonable size and
color limitations on illustrations of currency
and did not prohibit all such illustrations.
|
| • |
Federal
officials could prosecute Boggs because the
federal anti-counterfeiting statutes do not
require an intent to defraud. |
| • |
A
jury would be justified in finding that the
artwork was in the likeness of genuine United
States currency. |
In
upholding the anti-counterfeiting statute, the
court noted their acceptance of “Boggs'
belief that money is valued, in part, because
of our trust in our political institutions [and]
to that end, these political institutions should
be given the means by which to establish and maintain
the value of United States currency.” Boggs
continues to work as artist today, maintaining
his belief that money is an abstract concept that
can be manipulated in many ways.

|
|
| These
materials are not intended, and should not be used, as
legal advice. They necessarily contain generalizations
that are not applicable in all jurisdictions or circumstances.
Moreover, court decisions may be superceded by subsequent
rulings, and may be subject to alternative interpretations.
Corrections, clarification, and additions are welcome.
Please send to ncac@ncac.org. |
|
Action Alerts
» National
» Eastern
» Central
» Mountain
» Pacific
» email alert sign-up
» report censorship!
|