
in support of free expression
The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design
free speech first amendment censorship
|
|
|
|
|
Interstate
Circuit, a distributor of motion pictures, was
prohibited by the city of Dallas from distributing
a film entitled "Viva Maria". Pursuant
to a 1965 city ordinance, the Motion Picture Classification
Board of the City of Dallas classified the film
as "not suitable for young persons"
because it contained objectionable instances of
"sexual promiscuity". On appeal to the
Supreme Court of the United States, Interstate
challenged the determination of both the county
court and the appeals court of Texas that the
classification of the Motion Picture Classification
Board should stand.

The Supreme Court concluded that the standards
set forth in the ordinance were unconstitutionally
vague and the ordinance was therefore unenforceable.
The Court reasoned that the First
Amendment protects motion pictures and to
ban them based on the portrayal of undefined “sexual
promiscuity" would leave too much discretion
to the Motion Picture Classification Board. The
Court explained that even though a city has the
right to regulate the dissemination of objectionable
materials to young persons, it must provide narrowly
drawn, reasonable and definitive standards for
officials to follow. |
|
| These
materials are not intended, and should not be used, as
legal advice. They necessarily contain generalizations
that are not applicable in all jurisdictions or circumstances.
Moreover, court decisions may be superceded by subsequent
rulings, and may be subject to alternative interpretations.
Corrections, clarification, and additions are welcome.
Please send to ncac@ncac.org. |
|
Action Alerts
» National
» Eastern
» Central
» Mountain
» Pacific
» email alert sign-up
» report censorship!
|