- action | issues
- Academic Freedom
- Books
- Classrooms
- Copyright
- Film
- Government Secrecy
- Hate Speech
- Internet
- LGBT
- Libraries
- Music
- Nudity & Pornography
- Political Correctness
- Political Dissent
- Public Spaces
- Race Ethnicity Gender
- Radio & Television
- Religion
- Science
- Sex Education
- Theater & Performance
- Video Games
- Violence
- Visual Art
- Youth
- advocacy | projects
- education | resources
in support of free expression
The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
LAST UPDATED APRIL 2005
©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design
NCAC Censorship News Issue #76:
All About Art: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
The new director of the Detroit Institute of Arts padlocked the doors of an art exhibit, turning a show which was planned to display controversial art into a victim of censorship instead of its antidote. The exhibit, Art Until Now, was closed two days after its November opening by Director Graham Beal because some of the religious and racial artworks may offend 'important parts of our community.' Michigan artist Jef Bourgeau spent two years—aided by a museum curator—designing 12 weekly installations representing 20th century art, including, 'the good, the bad, and the ugly.' The first, Van Gogh's Ear, was Bourgeau's own rendition of controversial art of the 1990s. It included a vial of urine, a reference to Andre Serrano's photograph, Piss Christ; a video mimicking British artist Tracey Emin's film of herself showering while menstruating; and a toy Jesus wearing a condom which Bourgeau imagined as Chris Ofili's response to the controversy over his painting, Holy Virgin Mary, of Brooklyn Museum fame.
Did the so-far-unsuccessful attempt by New York's mayor, Rudolph Giuliani, to close the Sensation show at the Brooklyn Museum (Censorship News 75) prompt the Detroit museum director to reject potentially controversial art? What commitment does a museum make when it commissions shows? And how is the integrity of the museum, as well as the rights of the artist and potential viewers, affected when a director steps in, and removes some of the artwork? Is it true, as the director of the DIA claimed, 'Asking an artist to exclude one work in favor of another is not censorship'?