- action | issues
- Academic Freedom
- Books
- Classrooms
- Copyright
- Film
- Government Secrecy
- Hate Speech
- Internet
- LGBT
- Libraries
- Music
- Nudity & Pornography
- Political Correctness
- Political Dissent
- Public Spaces
- Race Ethnicity Gender
- Radio & Television
- Religion
- Science
- Sex Education
- Theater & Performance
- Video Games
- Violence
- Visual Art
- Youth
- advocacy | projects
- education | resources
The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
LAST UPDATED APRIL 2005
©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design
NCAC Censorship News Issue #97:
Creationism by Any Other Name ...
Creationists have been battling the teaching of evolution at least since the Scopes Trial of 1925. Battles are still waging in state and local public boards of education, and in the courts. Religious conservatives pressure publishers to present "alternate theories" to evolution and to water down its treatment in biology textbooks. Their efforts in Texas and elsewhere have affected textbooks nationwide (CN 86).
Recently, the school board in Cobb County, Georgia designed stickers for biology books stating that evolution is "a theory, not a fact,.." A federal district court ruled that the stickers are an unconstitutional endorsement of religion and ordered them removed. The decision will be appealed.
Many teachers across the country are wary of teaching about evolution, and some Imax theaters have even banned science documentaries that refer to it. An organization called the Discovery Institute promotes efforts to force school boards to "balance" evolution with teaching "intelligent design," which invokes a higher power. In contrast to creationism, "intelligent design" does not identify a specific religious "designer," presumably to avoid constitutional challenge. Nonetheless, some parents, aided by the ACLU, have challenged the teaching of "intelligent design" in schools in Dover, PA. Some 19 states, including Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and South Carolina are in the process of reevaluating public school science curricula. For more about "intelligent design," see Jim Holt's article Unintelligent Design in this issue.