- action | issues
- Academic Freedom
- Books
- Classrooms
- Copyright
- Film
- Government Secrecy
- Hate Speech
- Internet
- LGBT
- Libraries
- Music
- Nudity & Pornography
- Political Correctness
- Political Dissent
- Public Spaces
- Race Ethnicity Gender
- Radio & Television
- Religion
- Science
- Sex Education
- Theater & Performance
- Video Games
- Violence
- Visual Art
- Youth
- advocacy | projects
- education | resources
The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
LAST UPDATED APRIL 2005
©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design
NCAC Censorship News Issue #99:
USA Patriot Act in Flux
A federal district court in Connecticut has issued a preliminary injunction against a “gag order,” part of a National Security Letter, issued by the FBI to obtain library records. Institutions receiving National Security Letters are forbidden to inform anyone about the search.
The ACLU, which brought the case, claims that the gag rule prevents its client from participating in the congressional debate over the Patriot Act. Judge Janet Hall agreed, writing that “the statute has the practical effect of silencing those who have the most intimate knowledge of [its] effect and a strong interest in advocating against the government's broad investigative powers.” The order has been stayed pending appeal.
As of this writing, renewal of the Patriot Act is pending in Congress. The House and Senate passed different versions, which a conference committee plans to reconcile on October 17. Neither version restores the confidentiality of library and bookstore records that existed before its enactment, but the Senate version (S1389) comes close.