| Join NCAC Now | |
EXPRESS YOURSELF! |
in support of free expression The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
©Copyright 2005 NCAC free speech first amendment censorship |
Resources NCAC Letter to Vice President Al Gore About Internet Censorship Vice President Al Gore Dear Vice President Gore: We write to express our increasing concern over your public statements about children and the Internet, and specifically your endorsement of something called the "Parents Protection Page," as a "public-private partnership" to facilitate Internet censorship. Government can play an important role in providing educational information to maximize the publics ability to use technological tools like the Internet. For example, the Department of Education and the FBI provide valuable information, which parents may access on a voluntary basis, to assist in supervising their childrens Internet use. In contrast, according to your description the Parents Protection Page "will appear on virtually every Internet starting point automatically....right there, staring you in the face every time you turn the computer on." Its purpose is to induce parents to "play an aggressive, proactive role in protecting their children on the Internet" by installing tools to block, filter, and monitor their childrens Internet activities. The deficiencies in blocking and filtering software are well-recognized and documented. Such devices are over and under-inclusive, employ subjective judgments, exclude a great deal of useful information, and often conceal both the criteria for blocking and information about what material is blocked. Many responsible parents, teachers, librarians, and other caring adults recognize these deficiencies and opt instead for educating young people. Along with teaching children not to talk to strangers and to cross with the light, they also instruct children in personal safety online. Instead of spying on their children, they might try to engage them in conversation, be sensitive to their concerns, and create a relationship based on mutual trust. The killings in Littleton were a dreadful tragedy to the people directly involved, and deeply disturbing to the rest of us. But it is wrong and cruel to herald the Parents Protection Page as a solution, to blame the Internet as a causative agent in these events, or to suggest that such tragedies could be averted just by installing a device on the computer. Oversimplifying the causes and cures for teenage violence is dangerous business, as demonstrated by the increasing number of young people who have been ejected from school and even arrested for saying or doing something deemed "threatening" - but who have neither actually threatened nor harmed anyone. It would be doubly tragic if the deaths in Littleton unleashed a torrent of irrationality and scapegoating, but no effective inquiry into the real indicators and precursors of teenage violence. We hope that you will provide leadership, sorely lacking from the current public debate, that will help restore rationality and balance to this discussion. Sincerely,
|
Action Alerts ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|