- action | issues
- Academic Freedom
- Books
- Classrooms
- Copyright
- Film
- Government Secrecy
- Hate Speech
- Internet
- LGBT
- Libraries
- Music
- Nudity & Pornography
- Political Correctness
- Political Dissent
- Public Spaces
- Race Ethnicity Gender
- Radio & Television
- Religion
- Science
- Sex Education
- Theater & Performance
- Video Games
- Violence
- Visual Art
- Youth
- advocacy | projects
- education | resources
in support of free expression
The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
©Copyright 2005 NCAC
WEB DESIGN
Jeanne Criscola Criscola Design
free speech first amendment censorship
Letter to the Editor Opposing Removal of The Giver from 6th Grade Reading list
November 8, 2007
To the Editor of the Bay Area News Group:
Mt. Diablo School District should stand by First Amendment principles in its review of Lois Lowry’s award-winning book The Giver. We urge them to keep the book on the sixth-grade optional reading list and library shelves, available to all.
Since the book is optional, the children of parents who object to it do not have to read it. Other parents, however, may appreciate the opportunity The Giver affords for their children to think about the difficult topics it raises. The First Amendment allows all parents to make their own decisions how to guide their child’s reading, without interference by others with different values, views and backgrounds.
The task of selecting readings for the curriculum properly belongs to professional educators. Parents may be equipped to make choices for their own children but they are not equipped to make decisions that address the needs of all students. Furthermore, acceding to any request to censor materials invites others to demand changes to reflect their beliefs, leaving school officials vulnerable to multiple, possibly conflicting, demands.
The district should stand by the principle so essential to individual freedom, democracy, and a good education: the right to read, inquire, and think for ourselves.
Sincerely,
Claire Karpen
Youth Program Coordinator
National Coalition Against Censorship
Action Alerts
