| Join NCAC Now | |
EXPRESS YOURSELF! |
in support of free expression The information presented here by the National
Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) may be freely redistributed in its entirety,
provided that readers are informed that the information was obtained from
NCAC's World Wide Web site and that credit is given to the appropriate source
of whatever information is used. Permission is expressly granted for the information
obtained to be made available for file transfer from installations offering
unrestricted anonymous file transfer on the Internet. Information found here
may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial documents without
the written permission from the National Coalition Against Censorship.
©Copyright 2005 NCAC free speech first amendment censorship |
Letter from NCAC & ABFFE Protesting University of Colorado's Response to the Ward Churchill Controversy Chancellor
Phillip P. DiStefano Re: Professor Ward Churchill Dear Chancellor DiStefano and Members of the Board: We write to express concern about the university's response to the public controversy over views expressed by Professor Ward Churchill. In particular, we are troubled by reports that the Board of Regents and Chancellor have launched a "thorough examination of Professor Churchill's writings, speeches, tape recordings and other works," searching for "cause for dismissal." The outcry against Professor Churchill is based on an essay published three years ago, in which he suggested that the 9/11 attacks were retribution for U.S. foreign policy for which the victims shared some responsibility, and particularly for his use of the phrase, "little Eichmanns," to refer to WTC victims. Notwithstanding the insensitive language, the issue Churchill raises about citizens' responsibilities for the actions of their elected officials is surely a valid subject for academic discussion. This extraordinary review of Professor Churchill, a tenured professor, alone constitutes an infringement of academic freedom. Churchill is being investigated solely because of his controversial views, and any action taken in response will therefore be tainted. As the Colorado Supreme Court observed:
State Board of Community Colleges v. Olson, 687 P.2d 429, 437 (Colo. 1984)(en banc). See also Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234, 250 (1957) (plurality opinion) ("academic freedom and political expression [are] areas in which government should be extremely reticent to tread.") We are not surprised that Professor Churchill's remarks have led to calls for his dismissal. Free speech is always under pressure when the country is at war. But, in 1919, just months after the end of World War I, Oliver Wendell Holmes urged his country to reject censorship in favor of a "free trade in ideas" where "the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market." He urged tolerance even for abhorrent ideas:
Efforts to censor Churchill undermine the "free trade" in ideas and implicitly encourage threats and intimidation that will stifle open discussion. We are particularly concerned that this controversy will create "a pall of orthodoxy" over higher education, Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603 (1967). It is the role of colleges and universities to serve as models for the kind of informed, civil and respectful debate that is essential in a democracy. Such a debate is impossible if a professor fears possible dismissal every time he or she expresses a controversial opinion. We urge you to preserve the University of Colorado as a marketplace of ideas by dropping your investigation of Professor Churchill. Sincerely, Joan
E. Bertin Chris
Finan The above letter was sent to: Chancellor
Philip P. DiStefano and Members of the Board of Regents:
Dr.
Peter Steinhauer (D.D.S.) Ms.
Cindy Carlisle Ms.
Patricia Hayes
Mr.
Michael Carrigan Mr.
Tom Lucero Mr.
Steve Bosley Mr.
Jerry G. Rutledge, Chair Mr.
Paul Schauer Ms.
Gail Schwartz, Vice Chair cc:
Governor Bill Owens |
Action Alerts ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|