The recent letter from the White House, demanding a review of Smithsonian activities in the lead-up to the 250th anniversary of the United States, signals a dangerous new chapter in the politicization of cultural institutions. The administration not only questioned the Smithsonian’s programming but also issued a list of specific exhibits and content it found objectionable. In doing so, it has revealed its intent to censor narratives that challenge its preferred vision of American exceptionalism.
Historians, museum leaders, and free expression advocates have responded with alarm. The Organization of American Historians (OAH), the American Alliance of Museums, and the American Association for State and Local History, among others, have condemned the attempt as an infringement on the Smithsonian’s independence and a threat to the integrity of historical practice. Their message is clear: no president has the legitimate authority to dictate how the Smithsonian interprets history. Established in 1846 by Congress as a unique and independent agency, the Smithsonian operates under a bipartisan Board of Regents—not the executive branch.
NCAC’s Full Statement, Click Here for a Full-Screen View: